ok from the House on the agenda of the majority on Canzio’s report. Libera’s were rejected

After the evening session, which ended at midnight, work resumed this morning – on the second appeal – again from paragraph 10. The rehearsal phase opened with the intervention of the Secretary of State Ugoliniwhich responded to the Opposition, especially with regard to the contribution they made to the reform process. Challengedin essence, a its absence in the synthesis phase. Following Matteo Rossi, NPRread aa OdG – signed by the majority and by Rossano Fabbri – expressing satisfaction with the progress of the jurisdiction, and satisfaction with the certification of the GREC; and this thanks to the reform package approved in recent months. Maximum attention is also called to the danger of reciprocal invasions of singing between politics and justice. Finally, the Congress undertakes to prepare the necessary interventions to respond to the lack of human, infrastructural and technological resources of the Court. To follow the Secretary of State Lonfernini, who lamented the position expressed by some of the opposition. Hence an invitation to create a system on these topics. But he didn’t miss a beat Most Ora.sm; on the management of the case of Justice spoke of a confusing situation, “Apparently skewed” and total lack of serenity in court. The directors of Freewith repetitions of Giuseppe Maria Morganti, Alessandro Bevitori, Eva Guidi and Vladimiro Selva. An ever-attentive and constructive attitude towards reforms is demanded. It has been said that the “aggressiveness” of the government on the role of the opposition makes no sense. Therefore, two Odg. The first – focused on the issue of procedural prescription (1,011 reported cases) – calls for an internal investigation in the Court to clarify the causes. The second, on the other hand, calls for the report to be integrated with the specific details of the work of each magistrate. In the course of the confrontation, he also participated Alessandro ManciniNPR, then we went back to the much debated quorum issue on the occasion of the session of the Plenary Session of the Judicial Council on July 24, 2020; with positions that remain distant. Speech also of Rossano Fabbri, Mixed Group, which has defined the allegations of the Opposition as unfounded; in fact, the courts spoke of “defenestrations.” I think we can never be objective on both sides with Justice, he said Grace Zafferani,

Mixed Group; who also recalled his own experience as Captain Regent. An unworthy atmosphere has been felt for several years, he said. Finally, the conclusions of the Secretary of State for Justice. From Ugolini the hope that a new phase will indeed open. However, remember the Opposition’s “ongoing” communications on these issues with phrases such as the now well-known “land of chickpeas”. Finally, he emphasized that in each confrontation we must finally “find a balance”; and it is precisely at this point that disputes against minority forces are centered. We then proceeded to vote on the 3 OdGs presented. The one presented by the majority was declared acceptable by Secretary Ugolini. However, he anticipated that the approach and planning of the issue of “trial” is not easy. On the other hand, the issue of Libera’s first agenda has already been “attentive”. Internal investigation is already part of the powers of the Manager – explained the Secretary of State – and we are already moving in the direction of balancing workloads to avoid procedural prescription. The Commission has also been informed, which has taken steps to remove the magistrates from further diligence. The same line in Libera’s other agenda, that of analyzing the productivity of individual magistrates. An evaluation is already planned every 5 years, Ugolini explained. Below are the explanations of vote of the different forces on the agenda of the majority. Libera announced its opposition, referring especially to the formulation of a passage: to criticize – Eva Guidi has underlined, in reference to the separation of the powers of the State – does not mean “to ingest”. These positions are so generic that it is unclear whether Canzio’s line is shared, observed Andrea Zafferani, for RF. Important things are missing, in particular the items on Libera’s agenda: the prescriptions and the “evaluation” of the Magistrates. Then Rossano Fabbri, Mixed Minority Group; on this issue we stand as MIS next to the country, we will support the Odg. Alberto Giordano Spagni Reffi announced the positive vote of RETE and the majority, regretting the position expressed by the opposition. Finally, the agenda was approved by the majority and Rossano Fabbri. Thus Libera’s first agenda, that of the analysis of the “productivity” of individual magistrates. Gian Nicola Berti spoke on behalf of the majority. The agenda, in his opinion, is contrary to the rules of the judicial system. Libera then requested the withdrawal, also on the grounds of non-interference with the Court’s matters. With this agenda, politics is not at the heart of the actions of individual magistrates, however, Giuseppe Maria Morganti specifies; emphasizing how these data benefit the work of the judicial council and the commission of justice. Today, the sole magistrate is no longer being tried, but the office, said Rossano Fabbri, Mixed Opposition Group; asking in turn to withdraw to avoid rejection. On the other hand, in favor of the agenda, RF; he emphasized the need to be informed about these issues. Also for the role of the Justice Affairs Committee in trade union actions. Then the vote; Rejected the agenda with 26 votes against and 6 in favor. At this point the explanations of vote on the second agenda of Libera, on the problem of recipes. For the most part always Gian Nicola Berti; to be rejected – according to the OdG – as “overwhelmed by events”. RF’s Nicola Renzi emphasized that this was a “key issue”. He then wondered whether this mass of prescriptions was due to the inertia of individual magistrates or to issues relating to the distribution of workloads. We will vote in favor. Rossano Fabbri, Joint Opposition Group, highlighted the “many proceedings” opened at the ECHR for denied justice; the agenda raises an important issue, he continued, but I think that Libera’s request has already been answered. So Eva Guidi; we believe the high number of recipes needs a thorough root cause analysis, he said; to avoid “this great defeat of Justice.” The agenda was rejected by 28 votes to 6, with one abstention. The paragraph has been closed; and then move on to the analysis of the agenda presented by Repubblica Futura in the communications paragraph.

Leave a Comment